Israel/Hamas Ceasefire? Botmaster Phil Godzin’s forecast details, Aug. 20, 2025

Will there be a ceasefire declared between Israel and Hamas in the month of August 2025?

Here’s what Phillip Godzin’s pgodzinai predicts today:

Probability: 38%

39–49 minutes read Condensed version here —>

Perplexity response:
{think}

The user is asking about whether there will be a ceasefire declared between Israel and Hamas in the month of August 2025. The current date is Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 1:12:41 PM UTC. So we’re already in August 2025 and have passed the 20th day of the month.
Let me analyze the search results to see what relevant information I can find:
From search result [1] (Aug 18, 2025): Hamas has agreed to an Egyptian and Qatari proposal for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. This was from Channel 4 News on August 18, 2025. The proposal involves Palestinian prisoners being released in return for half the Israeli hostages. However, the search result also mentions that Israel has hardened its stance and would only agree to a deal where all hostages are released in one go and other conditions including Hamas disarming. An Israeli official quoted in Israeli media suggests their position hasn’t changed. Netanyahu was asked about this but didn’t comment directly.
From search result [3] (Aug 15, 2025): This mentions that Hamas failed to agree on a ceasefire “this week” and US Special Envoy Witkoff said they’re bringing their team home from Doha after Hamas’s latest response showed “a lack of desire to reach a ceasefire in Gaza.” This seems to contradict the information in search result [1].
The other search results don’t seem directly relevant to the ceasefire question.
Since I’m acting as a research assistant to a superforecaster, I need to:
1. First think step by step about what information I need
2. Start with a list of 10 citations (though I only have 5 search results, so I’ll work with what I have)
3. Provide detailed analysis
Let me structure this properly. ## Planning Analysis
To effectively assess the likelihood of a ceasefire declaration between Israel and Hamas in August 2025, I need to examine: current negotiation status, recent diplomatic developments, positions of key mediators (Egypt, Qatar, US), statements from both Israeli and Hamas leadership, and any timeline indicators for potential agreements.
## Citation Analysis
Based on the available search results, here are the key sources with relevant information:
**1. Channel 4 News – “Hamas accepts ceasefire plan as Israel pushes forward”**
*Date: August 18, 2025*
*Description: Video report on Hamas agreement to ceasefire proposal*
*Summary: Hamas agreed to an Egyptian and Qatari proposal for a 60-day ceasefire involving prisoner exchanges for hostages. The proposal is based on a two-phase release of remaining hostages during the ceasefire period. However, Israel has reportedly hardened its stance since previous failed negotiations, demanding all hostages be released simultaneously and Hamas disarmament.*
**2. Abraham Global Peace Initiative – “News”**
*Date: August 15, 2025*
*Description: Newsletter covering Middle East peace developments*
*Summary: US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff announced bringing the negotiation team home from Doha after Hamas’s latest response showed “lack of desire to reach a ceasefire in Gaza.” The envoy stated Hamas “does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith” and mentioned considering “alternative options.” This contradicts reports of Hamas accepting proposals.*
**3. Wikipedia – “International recognition of Palestine”**
*Date: August 14, 2025*
*Description: Article on Palestinian statehood recognition*
*Summary: Contains background on Palestinian diplomatic initiatives with 147 UN member states recognizing Palestine as of March 2025. France, Malta, and Australia announced plans to recognize Palestine at the September 2025 UN General Assembly, indicating ongoing diplomatic momentum separate from ceasefire negotiations.*
## Current Situation Assessment
The available information presents **conflicting narratives** about ceasefire progress in August 2025. Hamas reportedly accepted an Egyptian-Qatari mediated 60-day ceasefire proposal on August 18, 2025, which would involve a two-phase hostage release process[1]. This proposal mirrors earlier frameworks from June 2025 by US envoy Steve Witkoff[1].
However, significant obstacles remain. Israel has maintained its hardened position requiring complete hostage release in a single phase and Hamas disarmament as preconditions[1]. An Israeli official quoted in Israeli media suggested Netanyahu’s government position remained unchanged as of August 18[1].
## Diplomatic Contradictions
The situation is complicated by contradictory reports from US mediation efforts. As of August 15, 2025, US Special Envoy Witkoff announced withdrawing the American negotiation team from Doha, citing Hamas’s “lack of desire to reach a ceasefire” and stating the group was not “acting in good faith”[3]. This suggests negotiations had stalled just three days before reports emerged of Hamas accepting the proposal.
## Key Timeline Factors
With the current date being August 20, 2025, there are only **10 days remaining** in August for a ceasefire declaration. The conflicting reports from August 15-18 indicate significant diplomatic volatility, with positions appearing to shift rapidly between breakdown and potential breakthrough.
The presence of multiple mediators (Egypt, Qatar, US) and the two-phase structure of the proposed agreement suggest any final declaration would require complex coordination and likely take additional time beyond the immediate framework acceptance by Hamas.
Grok response:
Below is a detailed rundown of the most relevant news and context regarding the question of whether there will be a ceasefire declared between Israel and Hamas in August 2025. As a research assistant, my role is to provide factual context from recent and authoritative sources without producing any forecasts. This question falls under a Political Event category, so I have prioritized recent news articles, official statements, and developments from diplomatic negotiations. I focused on sources from August 2025, emphasizing updates from the past two weeks, as they are the most pertinent to current events.
To structure this response, I first compiled a list of 10 citations based on recent web sources. These include a mix of international news outlets, diplomatic reports, and analyses to ensure variety. Each citation includes the title, a brief description, the date of publication, and a three-sentence summary of the relevant content. I drew from reliable sources such as BBC, The Guardian, Reuters, CNN, and others, prioritizing those published in the last 14 days.
After the list, I’ll provide a detailed overview of the key developments, highlighting recent updates, expert opinions, and any indicators of movement toward a ceasefire resolution.
### List of 10 Citations
1. **Title:** 2025 Gaza war ceasefire – Wikipedia
**Description:** A Wikipedia page summarizing the ongoing ceasefire negotiations in the Gaza conflict, including diplomatic efforts and obstacles.
**Date of Publication:** August 16, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This source details Egypt’s opposition to Israeli occupation of the Philadelphi corridor as a potential violation of the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, which could complicate ceasefire talks. It highlights how Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s reluctance to pursue a deal, as reported by unnamed sources, has stalled progress despite earlier proposals. Additionally, it notes that continued Israeli military operations in Gaza City could have disastrous repercussions for negotiations, emphasizing the challenges in reaching an agreement by mid-August.
2. **Title:** Hamas source says group agrees to latest Gaza ceasefire proposal
**Description:** A BBC article reporting on Hamas’s acceptance of a ceasefire proposal mediated by Egypt and Qatar.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The article states that Hamas has agreed to a proposal involving a 60-day truce and the release of Israeli hostages in two batches. It mentions that the deal would require Israel to respond, but past negotiations have faced hurdles due to differing demands. This development indicates potential progress in talks, though it notes uncertainties about Israel’s commitment.
3. **Title:** Hamas says it accepts proposal for Gaza ceasefire and release of hostages
**Description:** A Guardian article covering Hamas’s formal acceptance of a ceasefire framework and its implications for hostage exchanges.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** According to the article, the proposal includes a 60-day halt to violence and the exchange of half of the living Israeli hostages for Palestinian prisoners. It highlights pressure on Israel to accept, as the plan is nearly identical to a US-backed proposal from earlier in the year. Expert opinions cited suggest that failure to agree could escalate the conflict, with mediators urging immediate action.
4. **Title:** Israel to respond by Friday over Gaza truce plan accepted by Hamas
**Description:** A Guardian report on Israel’s timeline for responding to the ceasefire proposal and the surrounding diplomatic pressures.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The article indicates that Israel is under pressure to respond by August 22, 2025, to a truce plan that aligns with previous US-mediated efforts. It discusses criticisms from international actors, including concerns that ongoing military operations could derail the deal. Sources suggest this could be a pivotal moment, with expert analysts warning of potential escalation if no agreement is reached.
5. **Title:** Hamas accepts proposed deal for ceasefire with Israel and hostage release, Egyptian source says
**Description:** A Reuters article based on Egyptian sources confirming Hamas’s acceptance of a ceasefire outline.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025 (approximately 1 day ago from current date)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This source reports that Hamas accepted a deal involving a 60-day truce and the release of hostages, but notes Israel’s hesitation amid ongoing military actions. It highlights potential risks, such as an Israeli incursion into Gaza City that could displace thousands and complicate negotiations. Expert opinions from mediators emphasize the need for swift Israeli approval to avoid further humanitarian crises.
6. **Title:** What to know about talks on Israel-Hamas ceasefire
**Description:** An AP News overview of the latest ceasefire negotiations, including key proposals and historical context.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025 (approximately 1 day ago from current date)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The article outlines Hamas’s acceptance of a proposal from Arab mediators for a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict, which began in 2023. It details the terms, such as hostage releases and truces, while noting significant gaps between the parties’ positions. Analysts quoted in the piece suggest that international pressure, including from the US, could influence outcomes, but past failures indicate uncertainty.
7. **Title:** US discussing latest Gaza ceasefire proposal, White House says
**Description:** An Indian Express article on US involvement in the ceasefire talks and the proposed 60-day truce.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025 (approximately 19 hours ago from current date)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This source confirms that the US is actively discussing a ceasefire proposal for a 60-day truce between Israel and Hamas. It mentions the involvement of regional mediators like Egypt and Qatar, with a focus on hostage releases as a key component. Expert opinions from US officials indicate optimism for progress, though they caution that implementation depends on both sides’ commitments.
8. **Title:** Inside the latest ceasefire agreement Hamas pledged to and Israel is considering
**Description:** An article from Anewz TV detailing the specifics of the ceasefire proposal and Israel’s review process.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025 (approximately 20 hours ago from current date)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The piece describes a 60-day ceasefire proposal that Hamas agreed to on August 18, 2025, including phased hostage exchanges and Israeli withdrawals. It notes that Israeli officials are studying the response but face internal political pressures that could delay acceptance. Commentators suggest this represents a rare opportunity for de-escalation, based on insights from diplomatic sources.
9. **Title:** Israel studying Hamas reply to Gaza ceasefire proposal
**Description:** A Reuters report on Israel’s formal review of Hamas’s response to the ceasefire offer.
**Date of Publication:** August 19, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This article states that Israel is examining Hamas’s reply to a proposal for a 60-day truce and the release of hostages held in Gaza. It highlights potential deal-breakers, such as demands for demilitarization and Israeli security control. Experts, including analysts from Reuters, warn that delays could lead to further violence, emphasizing the fragile state of negotiations.
10. **Title:** August 8, 2025 – Gaza News Updates
**Description:** A CNN live update on developments in Gaza, including criticisms of Israel’s plans and ceasefire talks.
**Date of Publication:** August 8, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The update criticizes Israel’s approval of a plan to occupy Gaza City, which could endanger hostages and complicate ceasefire efforts. It notes international backlash, including from Germany, against potential military escalations. While not the most recent, it provides context on how earlier decisions in August have influenced ongoing negotiations.
### Detailed Rundown of Relevant News and Context
Based on the citations above, recent developments in August 2025 show significant activity around ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, with several indicators of potential progress but also substantial obstacles. The most recent updates, from August 19, 2025, indicate that Hamas has formally accepted a ceasefire proposal mediated by Egypt and Qatar, which includes a 60-day truce and the phased release of hostages (e.g., in two batches, covering half of the living Israeli hostages). This proposal aligns closely with earlier US-backed plans, and sources like BBC and The Guardian report that Israel is actively studying the response, with a potential decision expected by August 22, 2025. These updates suggest movement toward resolution, as mediators are pushing for immediate action amid growing international pressure, including from the US and Germany, to prevent further escalation.
Expert opinions from authoritative sources, such as those cited in Reuters and The Guardian, emphasize the urgency of these talks. For instance, analysts warn that Israel’s continued military operations in Gaza City—approved earlier in the month—could “disastrous repercussions” for negotiations, potentially displacing hundreds of thousands and violating frameworks like the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty. While there are no specific polling data or approval ratings directly tied to this question, sentiment from posts on X (formerly Twitter) reflects widespread calls for a deal, with users referencing Hamas’s acceptance and ongoing diplomatic efforts; however, these should be treated as inconclusive reflections of public opinion rather than factual evidence. No official ceasefire declaration has been confirmed as of August 20, 2025, but the acceptance by Hamas marks a key development that could lead to further talks.
In terms of data and statistics, recent reports do not provide quantifiable metrics like approval ratings for the ceasefire proposal, as this is a fluid diplomatic process rather than an election. However, sources like AP News and CNN highlight the humanitarian context, noting that ongoing conflicts have led to repeated displacements in Gaza, with estimates from earlier August reports suggesting hundreds of thousands affected. For resolution criteria, authoritative sources such as those from mediators (e.g., Egypt, Qatar, and the US) will likely determine any official declaration, and based on the latest information, no final agreement has been reached. This context underscores the volatile nature of the situation, with experts from outlets like Reuters stressing that while there’s optimism for a deal before the end of August, historical patterns of stalled talks remain a significant risk.
Extracted resolution criteria links:
[]
________________________
Anthropic Binary response:
Let me analyze this step by step.
## Question Analysis
This is an “Other Binary Outcome Event” – whether a ceasefire will be declared between Israel and Hamas in August 2025. Today is August 20, 2025, and the resolution date is September 1, 2025, giving us only 11 days remaining in August.
## Current Situation Assessment
### Recent Developments (August 18-19, 2025)
The research reveals a critical diplomatic moment:
1. **Hamas accepted a ceasefire proposal** on August 18-19, mediated by Egypt and Qatar
2. The proposal includes a 60-day truce and phased hostage releases
3. Israel is currently studying the proposal with a response expected by August 22
### Conflicting Signals
However, there are significant contradictions:
– **August 15**: US Special Envoy Witkoff withdrew negotiation teams from Doha, citing Hamas’s “lack of desire” for ceasefire
– **August 18-19**: Hamas suddenly accepts the Egyptian-Qatari proposal
– This rapid shift (3-4 days) suggests either volatile negotiations or miscommunication
### Key Obstacles
1. **Israeli Position**: Israel has reportedly hardened its stance, demanding:
– All hostages released simultaneously (not phased)
– Hamas disarmament
– Netanyahu hasn’t directly commented on the latest proposal
2. **Time Constraints**: With only 11 days remaining in August, any declaration would need:
– Israeli acceptance (expected response by August 22)
– Final negotiations on details
– Formal announcement procedures
## Historical Context and Base Rates
Looking at past Israel-Hamas conflicts:
– Ceasefires typically take weeks to months to negotiate after initial proposals
– Previous negotiations in this conflict have repeatedly stalled
– The pattern shows multiple “near-breakthroughs” that ultimately fail
## Critical Assumptions to Question
### Assumption 1: Hamas’s acceptance is genuine and coordinated (70% chance of being correct)
The US envoy’s August 15 statement about Hamas not being “coordinated or acting in good faith” directly contradicts the August 18 acceptance. This could indicate:
– Internal Hamas divisions
– Tactical maneuvering
– Genuine change in position
### Assumption 2: Israel will meaningfully engage with this proposal (30% chance of happening)
Israel’s hardened stance and specific demands (all hostages at once, disarmament) appear incompatible with the current two-phase proposal. Netanyahu’s silence is telling.
### Assumption 3: Time is sufficient for declaration even if parties agree (40% chance if agreement reached)
Even with agreement in principle by August 22, formalizing a ceasefire typically requires additional days for:
– Technical details
– Coordination with mediators
– Public announcement procedures
## Timeline Analysis
If we consider different timeframes:
– **Next 5 days (by Aug 25)**: 15% chance – Would require immediate Israeli acceptance and rapid finalization
– **Next 11 days (by Aug 31)**: 25% chance – The question’s timeframe
– **Next 30 days (by Sep 20)**: 40% chance – More realistic for complex negotiations
– **Next 60 days (by Oct 20)**: 55% chance – Allows for multiple negotiation rounds
The concentration of probability in later timeframes suggests the August deadline is particularly challenging.
## Adjusting for Overconfidence
Given the historical base rate of ~35% positive resolutions and my tendency toward overconfidence, I should adjust downward. The conflicting signals, Israel’s hardened position, and extremely tight timeline all point toward a lower probability.
## Final Assessment
While Hamas’s acceptance creates momentum, the combination of:
– Israel’s demanding preconditions
– Only 11 days remaining
– History of failed negotiations
– Conflicting diplomatic signals
– Complex implementation requirements
…suggests that a formal ceasefire declaration in August 2025 remains unlikely despite recent progress.
Probability: 22%
The extracted probability is: 22%
Gemini Binary response:
## Reasoning Rationale for Ceasefire Forecast
To predict the likelihood of a ceasefire declaration between Israel and Hamas in August 2025, I have analyzed the most recent available information, focusing on developments from mid-August 2025 to the present (August 20, 2025). The short timeframe remaining in August (10 days) is a critical factor.
**Key Developments and Analysis:**
1. **Hamas’s Acceptance of Proposal:** On August 19, 2025, multiple reliable sources reported that Hamas formally accepted a ceasefire proposal mediated by Egypt and Qatar. This proposal includes a 60-day truce and a phased exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners. This is a significant positive development, as Hamas’s agreement is a prerequisite for any deal. The proposal is reportedly similar to a US-backed framework from earlier in the year.
2. **Israel’s Response and Deadline:** Israel is currently “studying” Hamas’s response. There is significant international pressure for Israel to respond by August 22, 2025. This indicates an active and potentially decisive phase of negotiations is underway. The proximity of this deadline to the end of August means that if a declaration is to occur, it must happen quickly after Israel’s response.
3. **Conflicting Signals and Historical Context:** While Hamas’s acceptance is positive, it contrasts with a US Special Envoy’s statement on August 15, 2025, that Hamas showed a “lack of desire” for a ceasefire. [Initial Context: 3] This highlights the volatility and rapid shifts in these negotiations. Historically, reaching and declaring ceasefires in this conflict has been extremely difficult and often protracted due to deeply entrenched positions and high stakes. Earlier in August, Israel’s approval of a plan to occupy Gaza City was criticized for potentially complicating ceasefire efforts.
4. **Israel’s Demands:** Past reports (as recent as August 18) indicate Israel has maintained a hardened stance, demanding the simultaneous release of all hostages and Hamas’s disarmament. The proposal Hamas accepted reportedly involves phased hostage releases and a 60-day truce, which may not fully align with Israel’s maximalist demands, creating a potential gap that could derail or delay a declaration.
**Assumptions and Potential for Failure:**
My forecast relies on two primary assumptions:
1. **Assumption 1: Israel will provide a decisive response to the proposal by August 22, 2025, and that response will be sufficiently positive (acceptance or a manageable counter-offer) to allow for a declaration by August 31.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~40%.** Israel has a history of internal political divisions and a strong stated commitment to its objectives (e.g., complete disarmament of Hamas). They could delay, reject, or present a counter-offer that is unacceptable to Hamas, pushing any declaration beyond August. The current Israeli government might face significant internal pressure against accepting a proposal that doesn’t fully meet its stated goals.
2. **Assumption 2: The remaining differences between the parties’ positions (particularly regarding hostage release terms, truce duration, and underlying political objectives) can be bridged within the remaining 10 days of August, even if Israel responds positively.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~25%.** Even with a positive initial response, the specific language and implementation details of a complex ceasefire agreement can require extensive negotiation. If the terms in the Hamas-accepted proposal are too far from Israel’s non-negotiable demands (e.g., regarding the number and type of prisoners to be released, or the scope of the truce), negotiations could stall despite initial goodwill, making a declaration by August 31 unlikely.
**Considering Biases and Base Rates:**
* **Overconfidence Bias:** I am deliberately moderating my prediction to account for a historical tendency towards overconfidence in forecasts.
* **Base Rate:** The base rate for quick and successful ceasefire declarations in this conflict is low, given its complexity and deeply rooted issues. The default state has been ongoing conflict.
* **Short Timeframe:** With only 10 days left in August, any declaration requires extremely rapid diplomatic progress once Israel issues its response.
**Overall Assessment:**
Hamas’s acceptance of the proposal represents a significant diplomatic opening. The current international pressure and the reported August 22 deadline for Israel’s response create a narrow but real window of opportunity. However, Israel’s past maximalist demands, potential internal political resistance, and the inherent complexity of such agreements pose substantial obstacles. The conflicting news from August 15 and 19 highlights the fluidity and fragility of the situation. While a declaration is plausible given the current momentum, the likelihood of one or both of my key assumptions failing means it is far from a certainty.
Considering all factors, I assign a moderate probability to a ceasefire being declared in August 2025.
Probability: 38%
The extracted probability is: 38%
GPT Binary response:
Reasoning and evidence (step-by-step)
What I’m predicting
– Question: Will there be a ceasefire declared between Israel and Hamas in August 2025 (after 2025‑08‑20 and before the resolution date 2025‑09‑01)?
– Interpretation/assumption I use below: “Ceasefire declared between Israel and Hamas” means an official, mutually recognized ceasefire agreement (i.e., both sides or their official representatives publicly agree to a truce/agreement to stop hostilities and announce it), not only unilateral or purely rhetorical statements. I’ll flag this assumption because it matters for how I interpret press reports.
Key, recent facts (most important, highly time‑sensitive)
– Multiple reputable outlets on 18–19 Aug 2025 reported that Hamas had accepted an Egyptian/Qatari 60‑day ceasefire proposal including phased hostage releases, and mediators are pressing Israel to respond quickly (BBC, Reuters, Guardian, AP summaries of Aug 19 coverage). Israel was said to be “studying” Hamas’s reply and under diplomatic pressure to respond by about Aug 22 in some reports.
– Contradictory reporting earlier in August (e.g., reports about U.S. envoys withdrawing a team or saying Hamas’s responses showed bad faith) shows negotiations have been volatile and can reverse quickly.
– Israel’s negotiating red lines (demilitarization, simultaneous release of all hostages) and domestic political constraints make Israeli acceptance politically fraught.
– Time remaining is short: today is 2025‑08‑20; only ~11 days left in August for a mutual declaration to occur.
Base rates and historical priors
– Historically, negotiated ceasefires in this conflict cycle have been difficult and often delayed, with many near‑agreements failing on final details. In similar rapid diplomatic pushes, about one third of such late‑stage proposals become fully implemented agreements within a few weeks; the rest collapse or are delayed for longer.
– Because we’re in a very short time window and because the event requires coordinated acceptance by both sides, the prior should be conservative.
Scenario decomposition and conditional likelihoods
– Best‑case scenario (fast acceptance): Hamas acceptance is genuine and coordinated; Israel, pressured by the US/regional mediators and facing international pressure, accepts the proposal within days and both parties announce a truce. If this path opens, a declaration within the Aug 21–31 window is highly likely (I’d put an 85–95% chance conditional on Israel accepting rapidly).
– Failure/drag scenario: Hamas acceptance is genuine but Israel’s government refuses the phased hostage approach or attaches unacceptable security conditions, so negotiations continue past August or break down. That is a commonly observed outcome.
– Collapse scenario: Hamas’s apparent acceptance is not coordinated, details leak, mediators lose leverage, or a military event (new operation, hostage rescue attempt, major escalation) makes talks collapse quickly.
Key quantitative judgments (and how I combine them)
– Probability Hamas acceptance report is genuine/coherent and not a misreport or immediate internal backtrack: 80%.
– Probability Israel will accept the mediators’ proposed phased/60‑day deal within this short window, conditional on Hamas’s acceptance and active mediator pressure: ~55%.
– Probability that, given Israel accepts, a public mutual ceasefire declaration is announced within Aug 21–31: ~90%.
– Combining: 0.80 * 0.55 * 0.90 ≈ 0.40 (40%). I add a small (+2–3%) tail for unlikely alternate paths (rapid political shifts, interim statements that count as a “declaration”) and round to an integer.
Shorter/longer timeframe probabilities (for context)
– Probability of a mutual ceasefire declaration by Aug 22 (near reported mediator deadline): ~30% (highly dependent on whether Israel replies positively on schedule).
– Probability by Aug 31 (end of month / this question’s window): 40% (my main forecast).
– Probability by end of September 2025: ~60% (extra time reduces timing friction; if talks don’t conclude in the last 11 days of August, they may be concluded in September as mediators regroup).
Two or three assumptions whose failure would most change the forecast (with probabilities of those failures)
1) Assumption: Hamas’s reported acceptance is genuine, coordinated, and durable.
– Probability this assumption is false (i.e., acceptance was misreported, internal dissent, or immediate backtrack): 20%.
– If false → my forecast falls dramatically (chance of a ceasefire in August would drop toward ~5–10%).
2) Assumption: Israel’s government (Netanyahu & cabinet/coalition) can be pressured/compelled to accept the phased/60‑day deal within this short window.
– Probability this assumption is false (i.e., Israel rejects/insists on different terms and stalls): 45%.
– If false → probability of an August mutual declaration falls to near zero; the outcome will likely be delay or collapse.
3) Assumption: No intervening military or political event (major escalation, hostage rescue, or internal political rupture) breaks negotiations in the next 11 days.
– Probability this assumption fails: 30%.
– If it fails → negotiations likely collapse or are delayed, reducing August odds substantially.
Calibration and uncertainty
– I’ve deliberately adjusted down from a naive “news optimism” estimate because (a) media reports of “acceptance” often precede final signed agreements, (b) Israeli domestic politics and red lines have repeatedly blocked such deals, and (c) there’s very little time left in the month.
– Uncertainty is high; avoid extreme claims. My forecast reflects both the positive signal (Hamas acceptance, active mediators) and the strong countervailing friction.
Final numeric forecast
Probability: 40%
The extracted probability is: 40%
All predictions: [22, 38, 40]
Filtered predictions: [38]
Median reasoning:
## Reasoning Rationale for Ceasefire Forecast
To predict the likelihood of a ceasefire declaration between Israel and Hamas in August 2025, I have analyzed the most recent available information, focusing on developments from mid-August 2025 to the present (August 20, 2025). The short timeframe remaining in August (10 days) is a critical factor.
**Key Developments and Analysis:**
1. **Hamas’s Acceptance of Proposal:** On August 19, 2025, multiple reliable sources reported that Hamas formally accepted a ceasefire proposal mediated by Egypt and Qatar. This proposal includes a 60-day truce and a phased exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners. This is a significant positive development, as Hamas’s agreement is a prerequisite for any deal. The proposal is reportedly similar to a US-backed framework from earlier in the year.
2. **Israel’s Response and Deadline:** Israel is currently “studying” Hamas’s response. There is significant international pressure for Israel to respond by August 22, 2025. This indicates an active and potentially decisive phase of negotiations is underway. The proximity of this deadline to the end of August means that if a declaration is to occur, it must happen quickly after Israel’s response.
3. **Conflicting Signals and Historical Context:** While Hamas’s acceptance is positive, it contrasts with a US Special Envoy’s statement on August 15, 2025, that Hamas showed a “lack of desire” for a ceasefire. [Initial Context: 3] This highlights the volatility and rapid shifts in these negotiations. Historically, reaching and declaring ceasefires in this conflict has been extremely difficult and often protracted due to deeply entrenched positions and high stakes. Earlier in August, Israel’s approval of a plan to occupy Gaza City was criticized for potentially complicating ceasefire efforts.
4. **Israel’s Demands:** Past reports (as recent as August 18) indicate Israel has maintained a hardened stance, demanding the simultaneous release of all hostages and Hamas’s disarmament. The proposal Hamas accepted reportedly involves phased hostage releases and a 60-day truce, which may not fully align with Israel’s maximalist demands, creating a potential gap that could derail or delay a declaration.
**Assumptions and Potential for Failure:**
My forecast relies on two primary assumptions:
1. **Assumption 1: Israel will provide a decisive response to the proposal by August 22, 2025, and that response will be sufficiently positive (acceptance or a manageable counter-offer) to allow for a declaration by August 31.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~40%.** Israel has a history of internal political divisions and a strong stated commitment to its objectives (e.g., complete disarmament of Hamas). They could delay, reject, or present a counter-offer that is unacceptable to Hamas, pushing any declaration beyond August. The current Israeli government might face significant internal pressure against accepting a proposal that doesn’t fully meet its stated goals.
2. **Assumption 2: The remaining differences between the parties’ positions (particularly regarding hostage release terms, truce duration, and underlying political objectives) can be bridged within the remaining 10 days of August, even if Israel responds positively.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~25%.** Even with a positive initial response, the specific language and implementation details of a complex ceasefire agreement can require extensive negotiation. If the terms in the Hamas-accepted proposal are too far from Israel’s non-negotiable demands (e.g., regarding the number and type of prisoners to be released, or the scope of the truce), negotiations could stall despite initial goodwill, making a declaration by August 31 unlikely.
**Considering Biases and Base Rates:**
* **Overconfidence Bias:** I am deliberately moderating my prediction to account for a historical tendency towards overconfidence in forecasts.
* **Base Rate:** The base rate for quick and successful ceasefire declarations in this conflict is low, given its complexity and deeply rooted issues. The default state has been ongoing conflict.
* **Short Timeframe:** With only 10 days left in August, any declaration requires extremely rapid diplomatic progress once Israel issues its response.
**Overall Assessment:**
Hamas’s acceptance of the proposal represents a significant diplomatic opening. The current international pressure and the reported August 22 deadline for Israel’s response create a narrow but real window of opportunity. However, Israel’s past maximalist demands, potential internal political resistance, and the inherent complexity of such agreements pose substantial obstacles. The conflicting news from August 15 and 19 highlights the fluidity and fragility of the situation. While a declaration is plausible given the current momentum, the likelihood of one or both of my key assumptions failing means it is far from a certainty.
Considering all factors, I assign a moderate probability to a ceasefire being declared in August 2025.
Probability: 38%
=== Forecast Result ===
{
“probability_yes”: 0.38,
“probability_yes_per_category”: null,
“continuous_cdf”: null
}
=== Reasoning ===
## Reasoning Rationale for Ceasefire Forecast
To predict the likelihood of a ceasefire declaration between Israel and Hamas in August 2025, I have analyzed the most recent available information, focusing on developments from mid-August 2025 to the present (August 20, 2025). The short timeframe remaining in August (10 days) is a critical factor.
**Key Developments and Analysis:**
1. **Hamas’s Acceptance of Proposal:** On August 19, 2025, multiple reliable sources reported that Hamas formally accepted a ceasefire proposal mediated by Egypt and Qatar. This proposal includes a 60-day truce and a phased exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners. This is a significant positive development, as Hamas’s agreement is a prerequisite for any deal. The proposal is reportedly similar to a US-backed framework from earlier in the year.
2. **Israel’s Response and Deadline:** Israel is currently “studying” Hamas’s response. There is significant international pressure for Israel to respond by August 22, 2025. This indicates an active and potentially decisive phase of negotiations is underway. The proximity of this deadline to the end of August means that if a declaration is to occur, it must happen quickly after Israel’s response.
3. **Conflicting Signals and Historical Context:** While Hamas’s acceptance is positive, it contrasts with a US Special Envoy’s statement on August 15, 2025, that Hamas showed a “lack of desire” for a ceasefire. [Initial Context: 3] This highlights the volatility and rapid shifts in these negotiations. Historically, reaching and declaring ceasefires in this conflict has been extremely difficult and often protracted due to deeply entrenched positions and high stakes. Earlier in August, Israel’s approval of a plan to occupy Gaza City was criticized for potentially complicating ceasefire efforts.
4. **Israel’s Demands:** Past reports (as recent as August 18) indicate Israel has maintained a hardened stance, demanding the simultaneous release of all hostages and Hamas’s disarmament. The proposal Hamas accepted reportedly involves phased hostage releases and a 60-day truce, which may not fully align with Israel’s maximalist demands, creating a potential gap that could derail or delay a declaration.
**Assumptions and Potential for Failure:**
My forecast relies on two primary assumptions:
1. **Assumption 1: Israel will provide a decisive response to the proposal by August 22, 2025, and that response will be sufficiently positive (acceptance or a manageable counter-offer) to allow for a declaration by August 31.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~40%.** Israel has a history of internal political divisions and a strong stated commitment to its objectives (e.g., complete disarmament of Hamas). They could delay, reject, or present a counter-offer that is unacceptable to Hamas, pushing any declaration beyond August. The current Israeli government might face significant internal pressure against accepting a proposal that doesn’t fully meet its stated goals.
2. **Assumption 2: The remaining differences between the parties’ positions (particularly regarding hostage release terms, truce duration, and underlying political objectives) can be bridged within the remaining 10 days of August, even if Israel responds positively.**
* **Probability of Failure/Incorrectness: ~25%.** Even with a positive initial response, the specific language and implementation details of a complex ceasefire agreement can require extensive negotiation. If the terms in the Hamas-accepted proposal are too far from Israel’s non-negotiable demands (e.g., regarding the number and type of prisoners to be released, or the scope of the truce), negotiations could stall despite initial goodwill, making a declaration by August 31 unlikely.
**Considering Biases and Base Rates:**
* **Overconfidence Bias:** I am deliberately moderating my prediction to account for a historical tendency towards overconfidence in forecasts.
* **Base Rate:** The base rate for quick and successful ceasefire declarations in this conflict is low, given its complexity and deeply rooted issues. The default state has been ongoing conflict.
* **Short Timeframe:** With only 10 days left in August, any declaration requires extremely rapid diplomatic progress once Israel issues its response.
**Overall Assessment:**
Hamas’s acceptance of the proposal represents a significant diplomatic opening. The current international pressure and the reported August 22 deadline for Israel’s response create a narrow but real window of opportunity. However, Israel’s past maximalist demands, potential internal political resistance, and the inherent complexity of such agreements pose substantial obstacles. The conflicting news from August 15 and 19 highlights the fluidity and fragility of the situation. While a declaration is plausible given the current momentum, the likelihood of one or both of my key assumptions failing means it is far from a certainty.

Considering all factors, I assign a moderate probability to a ceasefire being declared in August 2025.
Probability: 38%