Ukraine Conflict Deaths? Botmaster Phil Godzin’s full report of July 1, 2025

How many state-based conflict deaths (total of all civilian and combat deaths, including both Ukrainian and Russian combatants) will be reported by ACLED in Ukraine in June, 2025?

Here’s what Phil’s pgodzinai predicts today:

Less than 500: 5%
Between 500 and 1000: 25%
Between 1000 and 1500: 40%
Between 1500 and 2000: 20%
Greater than 2000: 10%

Perplexity response:
{think}

Okay, so the user is asking about the number of state-based conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025. They want to know which category it falls into: less than 500, 500-1000, etc. Let me look through the search results provided.
First, the search results are mostly from ACLED’s website. The latest updates are from June 2025. Let’s check each one.
Result [1] is the Ukraine Conflict Monitor, updated 31 January 2025. Wait, that’s actually from January, not June. But the page might have been accessed recently. The content mentions weekly situation updates from January 2025, but the page was last updated in January. However, the search result’s URL shows the content from June 2025. Maybe there’s a discrepancy here. The key trends from 18-24 January 2025 mention 1,391 political violence events and 24 civilians killed. But that’s from January, not June.
Result [2] is about the Lebanon ceasefire, which isn’t relevant to Ukraine. Result [3] is the Ukraine war situation update for 7 June – 13 June 2025. That’s part of June. It states that Russian attacks killed at least 36 civilians. That’s a two-week period, so maybe the numbers are weekly. But the user is asking for the entire month of June. However, this is the latest data available. Result [5] is from ReliefWeb, citing ACLED’s report up to 30 April 2025, discussing drone casualties.
Wait, the other results: [4] is about the Red Sea and mentions ACLED but not Ukraine. [5] is from ReliefWeb, using ACLED’s data up to April 2025, discussing drones. So the most recent Ukraine data in the search results is from June 7-13, 2025, in result [3]. However, that’s only a week’s data. Maybe there’s another update. Wait, result [1] says that the Conflict Monitor is updated every Wednesday with data covering events from Saturday to Friday of the preceding week. So if the current date is July 1, 2025, the latest report would be for June 21-27, 2025, but the search results don’t include that. The latest in the provided results is June 25, but the data in [3] is up to June 13.
So we don’t have the full June data, only up to mid-June. The user’s question is about the entire month of June. The available data is only for part of the month. Let’s see: in the 7-13 June period (two weeks?), ACLED reported 36 civilian deaths. But state-based conflict deaths include both civilian and combatant deaths from both sides. The search results mention 24 civilians in January and 36 in June 7-13. However, combat deaths aren’t explicitly mentioned here.
Looking at result [5], which is from ReliefWeb, it discusses drone casualties up to April 2025, but the numbers aren’t specified. The user needs total state-based conflict deaths (civilians and combatants). The available data from June 7-13 is 36 civilian deaths, but combatants aren’t broken out.
Given that the user is asking for June 2025, and the latest data we have is up to June 13, we can’t get the full month’s total. However, the answer might need to extrapolate or state that the data isn’t available yet. But the resolution criteria say to use ACLED’s data from their site. Since the provided search results don’t include the full June data, the answer would have to use the available information.
Alternatively, maybe there’s a pattern from previous months. For example, if in January, the number of political violence events was 1,391, but that’s a different metric. The user is asking for deaths. The 7-13 June update mentions 36 civilian deaths, but combat deaths aren’t specified. If each week has around that number, monthly totals could add up, but without knowing combat deaths, it’s hard to estimate.
Given the options provided, the assistant needs to choose between the ranges. Since the available data is limited and the latest is mid-June, it’s possible that the full month’s total might not be available. However, the answer should note that the data is only partial. If the user is a superforecaster, the assistant should present the available data and possible context.
In the provided search results, there’s no direct mention of total state-based conflict deaths (combining civilians and combatants) for June 2025. The available numbers are from mid-June, which is a week’s data. Without combat numbers, it’s impossible to give an exact figure. Therefore, the answer should state that the data isn’t available yet or that it’s partial, and perhaps suggest that the answer can’t be determined based on provided sources. However, the user wants to choose from the given options.
Alternatively, maybe the assistant can infer based on the trend. For example, if each week in June has 36 civilian deaths (as in the 7-13 June period), and assuming each week adds similar civilian deaths, plus combat deaths, the total could be higher. But without exact numbers, this is speculative.
The answer should probably indicate that the required data isn’t available in the provided search results and that ACLED’s monthly report for June 2025 isn’t included here. Therefore, it’s impossible to answer definitively. However, based on the options, if the user has to choose, perhaps the assistant would note that the partial data from June 7-13 shows 36 civilian deaths, but without combat data, the total is unknown. Therefore, the answer can’t be determined from the provided sources, but the superforecaster should check the latest ACLED reports for the full June data. **Key ACLED Ukraine Conflict Data for June 2025**
1. **Ukraine War Situation Update: 7 June – 13 June 2025**
– *Date*: 25 June 2025 (reporting week of 7–13 June)
– *Civilians Killed*: At least 36 civilians died from Russian shelling, missiles, aerial bombs, and drones across multiple regions[3].
– *Combatant Casualties*: Not explicitly quantified in the provided data[3].
2. **Ukraine Conflict Monitor**
– *Last Updated*: 31 January 2025 (pre-June)
– *Methodology*: Weekly updates covering events from Saturday to Friday prior, released every Wednesday[1].
– *Previous Trends*: January 2025 saw 1,391 political violence events, with 24 civilian deaths in a single week and periodic long-range strikes[1][5].
3. **ReliefWeb Report on Drones (25 June 2025)**
– *Focus*: Risks of short-range drones in frontline areas, citing ACLED data up to April 2025[5].
– *Scope*: No June 2025 data included; emphasizes drone-related civilian casualties[5].
**Critical Observations**
– **Data Gaps**: No ACLED reports for the full month of June 2025 are available in the provided sources. The latest cited report (7–13 June) excludes combatant deaths and focuses on civilians[3][5].
– **Extrapolation Challenges**:
– June 7–13 saw **36 civilian deaths** from state violence. If extrapolated to a full month (4 weeks), this could imply ~144 civilian deaths, but combatant deaths remain unaccounted.
– Historical precedent (January 2025) suggests variable weekly death tolls, including both civilian and combatant casualties[1][3].
**Options Analysis**
| **Option** | **Plausibility** |
|——————–|———————————|
| **Less than 500** | Unlikely (even partial data suggests higher civilian deaths alone) |
| **500–1,000** | Moderate (if combat deaths are included and weekly trends hold) |
| **1,000–1,500** | Higher if escalation occurred |
| **1,500–2,000** | Possible but speculative |
| **>2,000** | Unlikely based on partial data |
**Recommendation**
Given the absence of full June data and the exclusion of combatant deaths in available reports, **“Between 1,000 and 1,500”** aligns most closely with the partial evidence (civilians) and historical conflict dynamics. However, this requires confirmation from ACLED’s complete June report, which is not accessible in the provided sources.
Grok response:
Below is a detailed rundown of the most relevant news, data, and sources for the question about the number of state-based conflict deaths (total of all civilian and combat deaths, including both Ukrainian and Russian combatants) reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025. As a research assistant, my role is to provide context based on available information without producing forecasts. The question pertains to a Political Event, specifically ongoing conflict tracking, so I prioritize recent data from authoritative sources like ACLED, news outlets, and related analyses. I focus on recent statistics, emphasizing updates from late June 2025, as the current date is July 1, 2025.
First, I am considering the key elements needed for an effective response:
– **Step-by-step reasoning:** The query requires data on total conflict deaths from ACLED, which tracks political violence events, including fatalities from state-based conflicts. I need to draw from recent ACLED reports, news updates, and related sources to provide a variety of perspectives. Since the authoritative source is ACLED (as per the resolution criteria), I am accessing their latest available data from their website and related platforms. The data should cover both Ukrainian and Russian sides, including civilians and combatants. I am prioritizing sources from June 2025 onward, aggregating partial data for June where available, and noting any recent trends in violence. Other sources, such as UN reports and news outlets, provide corroborating context on casualties, but ACLED is the primary reference.
– **Data emphasis:** ACLED’s updates often include weekly or situational breakdowns of fatalities. From the available information, I can reference partial June 2025 data (e.g., for specific weeks), but a full monthly total may not yet be finalized as of July 1. I am highlighting recent statistics, such as reported fatalities in mid-to-late June, and indicating trends like surges in drone attacks or civilian targeting. Expert opinions from ACLED and UN sources suggest escalating violence, but I am treating all data as inconclusive until official ACLED figures are released.
– **Recent updates and trends:** There are indications of increased civilian casualties in June 2025 based on ACLED’s situational updates and news reports, such as a noted surge in drone strikes. For instance, ACLED posts indicate rising fatalities in mid-June, and UN reports confirm a broader escalation. However, this is not a forecast—just context for the superforecaster.
Now, as per the instructions, I start with a list of 10 citations. These are drawn from a variety of recent and relevant sources, including ACLED’s own platforms, news articles, and analyses. I prioritize the most recent publications, ensuring a mix of perspectives on the Ukraine conflict. Each citation includes the title, a brief description, the date of publication, and a three-sentence summary of the relevant content.
### List of 10 Citations
1. **Title:** Ukraine Conflict Monitor | Interactive Ukraine War Map
**Description:** ACLED’s dedicated platform for real-time data on the Ukraine war, including an interactive map and curated data files.
**Date of Publication:** June 18, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This source provides near real-time tracking of political violence events in Ukraine, including state-based conflict deaths from the start of the invasion. For June 2025, it highlights a weekly update showing a drop in overall events but a surge in civilian fatalities, with data indicating around 49 reported civilian deaths in the 14-20 June period. It serves as the authoritative reference for resolution, offering breakdowns of actors, locations, and total fatalities involving both Ukrainian and Russian forces.
2. **Title:** Ukraine war situation update 31 May – 6 June 2025
**Description:** ACLED’s weekly situational report on violence in Ukraine, focusing on events, fatalities, and trends.
**Date of Publication:** June 18, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The report details political violence events from late May into early June 2025, noting fluctuations in clashes and fatalities. It reports on state-based conflict deaths, including both combatants and civilians, as part of broader trends in the region. This update sets the stage for June’s data, indicating potential escalation in drone attacks that could influence mid-month figures.
3. **Title:** Ukraine war situation update: 7 June – 13 June 2025
**Description:** Another ACLED weekly update analyzing conflict dynamics in Ukraine.
**Date of Publication:** June 25, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This report covers mid-June events, tracking increases in civilian targeting and overall violence metrics. It includes data on state-based deaths, emphasizing Russian and Ukrainian military engagements. The summary suggests a rising trend in fatalities that could carry into later June, based on observed patterns in drone usage and ground clashes.
4. **Title:** Ukraine Index: Tracking developments in the Ukraine war
**Description:** Brookings Institution’s compilation of security, economic, and political data on the Ukraine conflict.
**Date of Publication:** June 26, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The index graphically presents data on conflict-related deaths, drawing from sources like ACLED for verification. It highlights a noted increase in total fatalities for June 2025, with partial figures showing heightened violence in the second week. This source provides contextual expert analysis, indicating that civilian and combat deaths may be influenced by tactical shifts in the war.
5. **Title:** Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,223
**Description:** Al Jazeera’s ongoing tracker of daily developments in the Ukraine conflict.
**Date of Publication:** July 1, 2025 (published 10 hours ago)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The tracker summarizes recent events, including reported deaths from state-based violence in late June 2025. It references ACLED data to note spikes in civilian and combat fatalities due to intensified attacks. This provides real-time context on the cumulative impact of the conflict, showing potential alignment with ACLED’s partial June figures.
6. **Title:** Report reveals significant rise in civilian casualties and rights violations in Ukraine
**Description:** UN News report on human rights and casualty trends in the ongoing war.
**Date of Publication:** June 30, 2025 (published 20 hours ago)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The report documents a sharp rise in civilian casualties in June 2025, attributing it to drone attacks and escalated fighting. It estimates total deaths (civilians and combatants) based on data from sources like ACLED, noting over 140 injuries from a single strike in mid-June. Expert opinions from UN human rights officials highlight this as evidence of worsening conflict dynamics, potentially affecting ACLED’s final June tally.
7. **Title:** 4 killed, 15 injured in Russian attacks on Ukraine over past day
**Description:** Kyiv Independent’s coverage of recent military strikes and their human toll.
**Date of Publication:** July 1, 2025 (published 5 hours ago)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** This article reports on immediate casualties from attacks in late June 2025, including both civilians and combatants. It draws on Ukrainian Air Force data that aligns with ACLED’s tracking of state-based violence. The piece indicates a continuing trend of daily fatalities, which could contribute to higher totals in ACLED’s June summary.
8. **Title:** Russia-Ukraine War Updates: Key Developments as of June 30, 2025
**Description:** A news roundup from Ukraine Frontlines on the latest conflict developments.
**Date of Publication:** June 30, 2025 (published 1 day ago)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The update compiles data on ongoing violence, including estimates of deaths from ACLED sources for late June. It notes an increase in both Ukrainian and Russian combatant fatalities amid intensified operations. This reflects broader trends of escalation, providing context for potential final ACLED figures.
9. **Title:** Charted: Ukraine Is Russia’s Third Deadliest War
**Description:** Visual Capitalist’s analysis of historical and current Russian war fatalities.
**Date of Publication:** June 28, 2025
**Three-Sentence Summary:** The chart contextualizes Ukraine conflict deaths within Russia’s war history, using ACLED data for recent estimates. It highlights that June 2025 saw a surge in total fatalities, with partial data suggesting hundreds of deaths in the mid-month period. Expert opinions in the analysis warn of ongoing volatility, drawing from ACLED’s real-time monitoring.
10. **Title:** Posts from ACLED on X regarding Ukraine conflict updates
**Description:** Social media posts from ACLED summarizing recent violence trends in Ukraine.
**Date of Publication:** June 28, 2025 (most recent posts)
**Three-Sentence Summary:** These posts detail weekly data on political violence, including 49 reported civilian fatalities for 14-20 June 2025, as part of broader state-based conflict metrics. They emphasize a 29% increase in civilian deaths compared to the previous week, potentially involving combatants from both sides. While X posts reflect current sentiment and ACLED’s preliminary data, they should be treated as inconclusive and verified against official reports.
### Detailed Rundown of Relevant Information
Based on the citations above, the most recent data from ACLED and corroborating sources indicates ongoing escalations in state-based conflict deaths in Ukraine during June 2025, though a final monthly total from ACLED is not yet available as of July 1, 2025. Partial data from ACLED’s updates (e.g., for 14-20 June) reports 49 civilian fatalities in that week alone, with broader trends suggesting additional combatant deaths from Ukrainian and Russian forces. For context, UN and news sources like Al Jazeera and the Kyiv Independent report a significant rise in casualties, including at least 4 deaths from recent attacks and over 140 injuries from a mid-June strike, attributing this to intensified drone warfare and ground operations.
Recent updates show movement toward higher totals: ACLED’s situational reports and X posts highlight a 29% surge in civilian targeting incidents for mid-June, which could push overall deaths into the thousands if trends continued. Expert opinions from authoritative sources, such as ACLED analysts and UN human rights officials, emphasize the evolving tactics of the conflict, including remote violence that increases civilian risks. Historical context from sources like Brookings indicates seasonal fluctuations in violence, with June often seeing spikes due to warmer weather and strategic offensives, but all data here is from June 2025 or earlier—specifically, the partial ACLED figures for mid-June provide the latest values available today.
To summarize key statistics:
– **Latest relevant values from ACLED:** For 14-20 June 2025, 49 reported civilian fatalities were noted, as part of 1,391 political violence events; this does not include a full breakdown of combatants but aligns with trends of total state-based deaths.
– **Historical data for context:** ACLED’s earlier 2025 reports (e.g., May-June) show monthly fatalities ranging from hundreds to over a thousand, with volatility driven by weekly fluctuations; for comparison, the 7-13 June update reported increased events but no specific fatality totals.
– **No forecast:** This information is for contextual purposes only, and the superforecaster should monitor ACLED’s website for the official June 2025 total when released.
AskNews Deep Usage:
prompt_tokens=19945 completion_tokens=2220 total_tokens=0
AskNews Deep Search Response:
1. **Citation [5][6][8]**:
– **Title**: UN Reports on Civilian Casualties in Ukraine (June 30)
– **Date**: June 30, 2025
– **Summary**: The UN Human Rights Office reported a **37% increase in civilian casualties** (986 killed, 4,807 injured) from December 2024 to May 2025 compared to the prior year, driven by short-range drones. Experts note a failure to distinguish civilian/military targets, with trends suggesting escalating lethality.
2. **Citation [4]**:
– **Title**: Russia-Ukraine War Update (June 30)
– **Date**: June 30, 2025
– **Summary**: June 2025 saw **537 Russian airstrikes** (475 intercepted), daily artillery duels, and frozen peace talks. Ukrainian public support for negotiations rose to 56% despite territorial disputes.
3. **Citation [9]**:
– **Title**: Daily Conflict Report (June 28)
– **Date**: June 28, 2025
– **Summary**: On June 27–28, **1,000+ Russian soldiers** were reported killed in 153 clashes, alongside heavy drone/artillery use. ACLED data is not directly cited, but casualty rates align with prior months.
4. **Citation [16]**:
– **Title**: Ukraine’s Offensive Operations (June 22)
– **Date**: June 22, 2025
– **Summary**: Ukraine launched attacks in Russia’s Kursk region, reporting **1,100 Russian casualties in a single day** and over 1 million total Russian losses since 2022.
5. **Citation [17]**:
– **Title**: Territorial Gains and Military Losses (June 21)
– **Date**: June 21, 2025
– **Summary**: Russia gained 62 square miles in eastern Ukraine in one week, with **203 daily combat engagements** and 11–12 strategic bombers destroyed.
6. **Citation [30]**:
– **Title**: ACLED’s May 2025 Strikes Report (June 5)
– **Date**: June 5, 2025
– **Summary**: ACLED documented **24 Russian long-range strikes** (34 civilian deaths) in late May, with intensified front-line fighting in Donetsk/Kharkiv.
7. **Citation [15]**:
– **Title**: Global Conflict Deaths (June 22)
– **Date**: June 22, 2025
– **Summary**: PRIO/Uppsala data shows **76,000 battle deaths in Ukraine in 2024**, with 2025 projections noting continued high-intensity conflict.
8. **Citation [7]**:
– **Title**: UN Prisoner Execution Allegations (June 30)
– **Date**: June 30, 2025
– **Summary**: The UN verified executions of 35 POWs (34 Ukrainian, 1 Russian), reflecting worsening compliance with international law.
9. **Citation [19]**:
– **Title**: Humanitarian Crisis Worsens (June 20)
– **Date**: June 20, 2025
– **Summary**: 12.7 million Ukrainians require humanitarian aid; civilian casualties include **2,500+ children** since 2022.
10. **Citation [36][37]**:
– **Title**: Ceasefire Negotiations Stall (June 2)
– **Date**: June 2–3, 2025
– **Summary**: Peace talks in Istanbul collapsed over incompatible demands. Prisoner exchanges (6,000 bodies) proceeded, but frontline fighting persisted.
**Relevant Trends for June 2025**:
– **Civilian Deaths**: UN data projects **~200 monthly civilian fatalities** (based on H1 2025 averages) [5][6].
– **Military Deaths**: Daily casualty reports (e.g., 1,000+ Russian soldiers daily [9][16]) suggest **~1,500–2,000 monthly combatant deaths**.
**ACLED Context**:
While no direct June 2025 ACLED report is found, prior ACLED data [30] and UN/Ukrainian sources imply total deaths (civilian + combatant) in June likely fall in the **“Between 1000 and 1500”** range. However, the absence of an explicit ACLED publication leaves uncertainty, particularly if heavy fighting occurred late in June.
**Critical Limitation**: Official ACLED figures for June 2025 are not yet accessible in the retrieved documents. Forecasters should monitor https://acleddata.com/ukraine-conflict-monitor/ for updates.
GPT News Summary:
As of June 30, 2025, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, primarily between Russian and Ukrainian forces, has seen significant and escalating violence, contributing to substantial casualties among both combatants and civilians. Here are the key points relevant to estimating the number of conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025:
1. **Intensified Military Engagements**: Reports indicate a pronounced increase in active combat operations. For example, there were 111 reported clashes on June 30 alone, with concentrated fighting near frontline areas such as Pokrovsky, indicating sustained military engagements throughout June (source: lb.ua, June 30, 2025).
2. **Casualty Milestone**: Recent reports as of June 30, 2025, detail that Russian military losses have surpassed 1 million since the start of the invasion in February 2022, including 1,020,010 soldiers lost (source: wegotthiscovered.com, June 30, 2025). Ukrainian military casualties are also substantial, with estimates of over 400,000 soldiers killed or wounded.
3. **Civilian Casualties**: There has been a significant rise in civilian casualties over the months leading up to June 2025. The United Nations reports a 37% increase in civilian deaths from December 2024 to May 2025 (source: UN reports, June 30, 2025). Specific incidents include the bombing of densely populated civilian areas and drone attacks by Russian forces, indicating high potential civilian death tolls in June.
4. **Increased Attacks on Urban Areas**: The reports of June 29 and 30, 2025, from sources such as n-tv.de and focus.ua underscore heightened attacks on major cities like Kyiv, with a 97.2% increase in attacks over six months, indicating intensification in urban areas that typically result in higher civilian casualties.
5. **Human Rights Violations**: Reports of human rights abuses, including the execution of prisoners of war and targeting of hospitals, further contribute to the conflict’s death toll (source: OHCHR and related reports, June 30, 2025).
6. **Drone and Missile Warfare**: The use of drones and missiles has notably increased, with multiple sources citing the launching of over 2,736 drones in June 2025 alone, contributing to both combatant and civilian casualties in urban centers (source: focus.ua, June 28, 2025).
Overall, these elements indicate a June characterized by severe and widespread conflict activity, suggesting a high number of state-based conflict deaths are likely to be recorded for ACLED’s data in Ukraine during this time frame. The combination of intense ground clashes, increased urban attacks, and significant military and civilian casualties collectively suggest a high casualty count for June 2025.
Extracted resolution criteria links:
[‘https://acleddata.com/ukraine-conflict-monitor/’]
________________________
Claude Vision analysis response:
The image shows a CAPTCHA verification page from acleddata.com that is checking if the user is human. The page displays a security verification message from Cloudflare and states “acleddata.com needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding.”
This is not an actual data page from ACLED’s Ukraine Conflict Monitor but rather just a security gateway page before accessing the actual website. The image doesn’t contain any data, statistics, or trends about conflict deaths in Ukraine that would be relevant to the forecasting question.
To properly answer the question about state-based conflict deaths in Ukraine in June 2025, you would need to access the actual ACLED Ukraine Conflict Monitor data at the URL mentioned in the resolution criteria (https://acleddata.com/ukraine-conflict-monitor/), which would contain historical data on conflict fatalities that could help inform a prediction.
________________________
Anthropic response:
## Analysis of ACLED Conflict Death Data for Ukraine in June 2025
To forecast the number of state-based conflict deaths that ACLED will report for Ukraine in June 2025, I need to carefully evaluate the available data while acknowledging the limitations in our information.
### Current Data Assessment
The research assistants have provided partial information from ACLED and other sources for June 2025. The most direct ACLED data available is from their Ukraine War Situation Update covering June 7-13, which reported at least 36 civilian deaths from Russian attacks, but notably excluded combatant casualties. This represents only one week of the month, giving us a partial picture.
Additional context from other sources suggests:
– A 37% increase in civilian casualties from December 2024 to May 2025
– Reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in 153 clashes for specific days in late June
– Approximately 537 Russian airstrikes in June 2025
– Daily combat engagements averaging around 203 per day in certain periods
### Historical Context and Trends
ACLED’s methodology typically counts both civilian and combatant deaths in state-based conflict figures. Looking at historical patterns from early 2025 data, we saw about 1,391 political violence events in January 2025, with varying weekly death tolls.
The conflict appears to have maintained high intensity throughout 2025, with some research suggesting 76,000 battle deaths in Ukraine during 2024 (approximately 6,333 per month on average). While this provides context, I should be cautious about direct extrapolation as conflict intensity can fluctuate significantly.
### Forecasting Approach
Given the partial data available, I’ll need to estimate based on:
1. The reported 36 civilian deaths in one week (June 7-13)
2. Historical civilian-to-combatant death ratios in this conflict
3. Trends in combat intensity from surrounding months
4. Reports of continued heavy fighting in June 2025
If we conservatively extrapolate the 36 civilian deaths to a four-week period, we get approximately 144 civilian deaths for the month. However, in conflicts like Ukraine, combatant deaths typically outnumber civilian deaths by a significant margin. Based on historical patterns in this conflict, combatant deaths often range from 5-10 times higher than civilian deaths, which would suggest between 720-1,440 combatant deaths for the month.
Combined, this would put the total state-based conflict deaths between 864-1,584. However, this rough calculation comes with significant uncertainty.
### Key Assumptions and Uncertainties
1. **Representativeness of the June 7-13 period**: I’m assuming this week is representative of the entire month. If there were major offensives or periods of intensified fighting later in June, the actual figure could be significantly higher.
– Probability of this assumption being incorrect: 40%
– Impact: Could shift the estimate upward by 30-50%
2. **Civilian-to-combatant death ratio**: I’m assuming historical ratios hold for June 2025. This ratio can vary significantly based on the nature of operations.
– Probability of this assumption being incorrect: 30%
– Impact: Could shift the estimate in either direction by 20-40%
3. **Consistency of ACLED’s reporting methodology**: I’m assuming ACLED’s approach to counting and categorizing deaths remained consistent.
– Probability of this assumption being incorrect: 15%
– Impact: Could shift the estimate in either direction by 10-20%
### Final Assessment
Based on the partial data from one week in June showing 36 civilian deaths, reports of continued heavy fighting throughout the month, historical patterns of civilian-to-combatant death ratios, and the context of ongoing intense combat operations, the most likely range for ACLED’s reported state-based conflict deaths in Ukraine for June 2025 appears to be between 1,000 and 1,500.
The preceding range (500-1,000) seems somewhat low given the reported intensity of fighting, though remains plausible if combat deaths were lower than historical averages or if there was a temporary reduction in fighting intensity not captured in our partial data.
The higher ranges (1,500-2,000 and greater than 2,000) remain possible, particularly if there were major offensives or escalations later in the month that aren’t reflected in our partial data. However, without specific evidence of such escalation, these outcomes appear less likely than the central estimate.
Given these considerations and acknowledging the significant uncertainty in our data, my forecast is as follows:
Less than 500: 10
Between 500 and 1000: 30
Between 1000 and 1500: 40
Between 1500 and 2000: 15
Greater than 2000: 5
probability_yes_per_category: {‘Less than 500’: 0.1, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.3, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.15, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}
________________________
Anthropic response:
## Analysis of State-Based Conflict Deaths in Ukraine for June 2025
To forecast the number of state-based conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025, I need to carefully analyze available data and trends while acknowledging significant uncertainty given the current date (July 1, 2025) and the fact that complete ACLED reports for June may not yet be published.
### Available Data Assessment
The research assistants provide several key data points:
1. **Partial June 2025 Data**: One assistant mentions ACLED reporting for June 7-13, noting at least 36 civilian deaths from Russian attacks. This is incomplete as it:
– Covers only one week of June
– Only reports civilian deaths, not combatant casualties
– Does not provide a full monthly total
2. **Scale of Combat Operations**: Multiple sources indicate intense fighting continued through June 2025, with reports of:
– Daily Russian soldier deaths exceeding 1,000 on some days
– 537 Russian airstrikes in June
– 203 daily combat engagements in some periods
– 111 reported clashes on June 30 alone
3. **Historical Context**: The research reveals:
– A 37% increase in civilian casualties from December 2024 to May 2025
– 76,000 battle deaths in Ukraine in 2024 (averaging ~6,300 monthly)
– Previous ACLED data showing weekly civilian death totals in the 24-49 range
### Critical Analysis
Several factors point toward a relatively high death toll for June 2025:
1. **Continued High-Intensity Conflict**: Multiple sources confirm that fighting remained intense throughout June, with no ceasefire or significant de-escalation.
2. **Seasonal Factors**: June typically sees increased military operations due to favorable weather conditions, potentially driving up casualty figures.
3. **Civilian Impact**: The UN’s reporting of a 37% year-over-year increase in civilian casualties suggests the war continues to exact a heavy toll on non-combatants.
However, I must be careful not to overestimate based on limited data points:
1. **Single-Day vs. Monthly Averages**: Reports of “1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in a day” represent peak events, not sustainable averages.
2. **Source Reliability**: Some casualty claims may reflect propaganda elements from both sides of the conflict.
3. **ACLED’s Verification Process**: ACLED’s methodology includes verification steps that often result in lower confirmed death counts than initial reports suggest.
### Statistical Reasoning
If we take the partial data showing 36 civilian deaths in one week (June 7-13) and extrapolate to a full month (4.3 weeks), we’d estimate approximately 155 civilian deaths. Historically, civilian deaths represent a fraction of total casualties in this conflict, with combatant deaths significantly higher.
Based on the 76,000 battle deaths in 2024 (~6,300 monthly), and considering the reported 37% increase in casualties, we might expect monthly totals in 2025 to average around 8,600. However, these figures cover all of Ukraine, while ACLED’s reporting may be more conservative due to verification requirements.
If we assume civilian deaths represent 10-20% of total casualties (a common ratio in modern conflicts), and we have ~155 civilian deaths, this would suggest total deaths between 775-1,550. This aligns with the research assistant’s assessment that monthly combatant deaths likely fall in the 1,500-2,000 range.
### Key Assumptions and Uncertainty
1. **Assumption: ACLED’s June report will maintain similar verification standards as previous months**
– Probability of being incorrect: 15%
– Impact: If ACLED changes methodology, figures could shift significantly in either direction
2. **Assumption: The intensity of fighting in late June remained consistent with early/mid-June**
– Probability of being incorrect: 25%
– Impact: A significant escalation or de-escalation in late June could shift totals by hundreds of deaths
3. **Assumption: The ratio of civilian to combatant deaths remained relatively stable**
– Probability of being incorrect: 20%
– Impact: If tactics changed to target more civilians or focus on military targets, the total distribution would shift
### Final Assessment
Given the evidence from the research assistants, the most likely range for state-based conflict deaths in Ukraine for June 2025 as reported by ACLED is between 1000-1500, followed by 1500-2000. The evidence suggests ongoing intense combat operations with significant casualties, but without complete ACLED data for the full month, there remains substantial uncertainty.
The category “Less than 500” appears highly unlikely given the partial data already showing dozens of civilian deaths in just one week, plus the evidence of continued intense fighting. The “Greater than 2000” category is possible but less likely given ACLED’s rigorous verification processes.
Option_A: 5
Option_B: 20
Option_C: 45
Option_D: 25
Option_E: 5
probability_yes_per_category: {‘Less than 500’: 0.05, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.2, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.45, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.25, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}
________________________
Anthropic response:
## Analysis of State-based Conflict Deaths in Ukraine for June 2025
To forecast the number of state-based conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025, I need to carefully analyze the available data while acknowledging significant uncertainties in the information provided.
### Key Data Points and Trends
The research assistants have provided several relevant data points that help establish context:
1. **Partial June 2025 Data**: ACLED’s situational update for June 7-13, 2025 reported at least 36 civilian deaths from Russian attacks, but did not specify combatant casualties. Another source indicated 49 civilian deaths for the June 14-20 period, showing a 29% increase from the previous week.
2. **Intensity of Combat**: Multiple sources indicate high-intensity fighting during June 2025, with reports of approximately 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in 153 clashes (June 27-28), 537 Russian airstrikes (many intercepted), and 203 daily combat engagements in mid-June.
3. **Historical Context**: ACLED documented 24 Russian long-range strikes resulting in 34 civilian deaths in late May 2025. Previous data from January 2025 showed 1,391 political violence events with 24 civilian deaths in a single week.
4. **Broader Conflict Metrics**: UN reports indicate a 37% increase in civilian casualties from December 2024 to May 2025, with approximately 200 monthly civilian fatalities in the first half of 2025.
### Synthesizing the Evidence
Looking at this information holistically, I need to extrapolate the partial data to estimate the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025:
– **Civilian Deaths**: Based on the 36 civilian deaths in one week (June 7-13) and 49 in another (June 14-20), we can estimate approximately 150-200 civilian deaths for the full month of June if these trends continued.
– **Combatant Deaths**: The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed over just two days (June 27-28) suggest very high combatant casualties. Even if this is an overestimation or an outlier event, and the actual average is significantly lower, we’re still looking at potentially 800-1,500 combatant deaths across both sides for the month.
– **Trend Indicators**: Multiple sources point to intensification of conflict in June 2025, with increases in airstrikes, artillery engagements, and front-line clashes. This suggests that June’s casualty figures are likely to be on the higher end of recent monthly totals.
### Key Assumptions and Uncertainty Analysis
1. **Assumption: Recent Data is Representative** (70% confidence)
– The partial weekly data provided for June is representative of the entire month.
– If incorrect (30% chance), casualty figures could be higher or lower. If fighting significantly intensified in late June (as some sources suggest), the total could be higher than my estimate.
2. **Assumption: Combatant Death Reporting is Accurate** (60% confidence)
– The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in late June are broadly accurate.
– If incorrect (40% chance), this could significantly impact the total. Military casualties are often exaggerated in wartime reporting. However, even adjusted downward, the intensive combat described would still yield substantial casualties.
3. **Assumption: ACLED’s Methodology Remains Consistent** (85% confidence)
– ACLED’s approach to tallying and reporting state-based conflict deaths has remained consistent.
– If incorrect (15% chance), changes in methodology could affect how deaths are counted, potentially shifting the total between categories.
### Synthesis and Final Estimate
Combining the civilian death estimates (150-200) with combatant death estimates (800-1,500), the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025 would likely fall in the range of 950-1,700. The midpoint of this range is approximately 1,325, which falls in the “Between 1000 and 1500” category.
Given the intensity of fighting described, particularly in late June, the evidence suggests that the total is unlikely to be below 500. Similarly, while there’s some possibility the total could exceed 2,000 if the most extreme reports are accurate, the preponderance of evidence points toward the middle ranges.
The partial data and historical trends make the “Between 1000 and 1500” range most probable, with “Between 1500 and 2000” as the next most likely outcome given the reports of intensified fighting. There’s a moderate possibility for “Between 500 and 1000” if combatant casualties were significantly overreported or if there was a notable de-escalation in parts of June. The extreme categories (“Less than 500” and “Greater than 2000”) appear least likely based on the available evidence.
Taking all factors into account, including the uncertainty in the data and the possibility of reporting biases, my final probability distribution is:
Option_A: 5
Option_B: 25
Option_C: 40
Option_D: 20
Option_E: 10
probability_yes_per_category: {‘Less than 500’: 0.05000000000000001, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.25000000000000006, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4000000000000001, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.20000000000000004, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.0999999999999998}
Gemini Multiple Choice response:
None
Task failed with error: Received None for forecast_text. Cannot extract probabilities.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/home/runner/work/metaculus-forecasting-llm/metaculus-forecasting-llm/src/main.py”, line 112, in fetch_gemini_multiple_choice_prediction
return await fetch_sync(get_gemini_multiple_choice_prediction, title, perplexity_summary_report, asknews_summary, asknews_deep_research, vision_analysis, grok_report, today, resolution_date, background, fine_print, resolution_criteria, options)
File “/home/runner/work/metaculus-forecasting-llm/metaculus-forecasting-llm/src/main.py”, line 62, in fetch_sync
return await asyncio.get_event_loop().run_in_executor(
File “/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.18/x64/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/thread.py”, line 58, in run
result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File “/home/runner/work/metaculus-forecasting-llm/metaculus-forecasting-llm/src/main.py”, line 58, in run_sync
return future.result(timeout=180)
File “/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.18/x64/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py”, line 458, in result
return self.__get_result()
File “/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.18/x64/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py”, line 403, in __get_result
raise self._exception
File “/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.10.18/x64/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/thread.py”, line 58, in run
result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File “/home/runner/work/metaculus-forecasting-llm/metaculus-forecasting-llm/src/gemini_service_2.py”, line 100, in get_gemini_multiple_choice_prediction
option_probabilities = extract_option_probabilities_from_response(text, options)
File “/home/runner/work/metaculus-forecasting-llm/metaculus-forecasting-llm/src/utils.py”, line 38, in extract_option_probabilities_from_response
raise ValueError(“Received None for forecast_text. Cannot extract probabilities.”)
ValueError: Received None for forecast_text. Cannot extract probabilities.
All predictions:
[{‘Less than 500’: 0.1, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.3, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.15, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05000000000000001, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.25000000000000006, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4000000000000001, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.20000000000000004, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.0999999999999998}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.2, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.45, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.25, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}]
Filtered predictions:
[{‘Less than 500’: 0.05000000000000001, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.25000000000000006, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4000000000000001, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.20000000000000004, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.0999999999999998}]
Averaged predictions:
{‘Less than 500’: 0.05, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.2, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.45, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.25, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}
Median reasoning:
All Predictions:
[{‘Less than 500’: 0.1, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.3, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.15, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05000000000000001, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.25000000000000006, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4000000000000001, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.20000000000000004, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.0999999999999998}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.2, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.45, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.25, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}]
Median Reasoning:
EXTRACTED_PROBABILITIES: [5, 25, 40, 20, 10]
Model’s Answer:
## Analysis of State-based Conflict Deaths in Ukraine for June 2025
To forecast the number of state-based conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025, I need to carefully analyze the available data while acknowledging significant uncertainties in the information provided.
### Key Data Points and Trends
The research assistants have provided several relevant data points that help establish context:
1. **Partial June 2025 Data**: ACLED’s situational update for June 7-13, 2025 reported at least 36 civilian deaths from Russian attacks, but did not specify combatant casualties. Another source indicated 49 civilian deaths for the June 14-20 period, showing a 29% increase from the previous week.
2. **Intensity of Combat**: Multiple sources indicate high-intensity fighting during June 2025, with reports of approximately 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in 153 clashes (June 27-28), 537 Russian airstrikes (many intercepted), and 203 daily combat engagements in mid-June.
3. **Historical Context**: ACLED documented 24 Russian long-range strikes resulting in 34 civilian deaths in late May 2025. Previous data from January 2025 showed 1,391 political violence events with 24 civilian deaths in a single week.
4. **Broader Conflict Metrics**: UN reports indicate a 37% increase in civilian casualties from December 2024 to May 2025, with approximately 200 monthly civilian fatalities in the first half of 2025.
### Synthesizing the Evidence
Looking at this information holistically, I need to extrapolate the partial data to estimate the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025:
– **Civilian Deaths**: Based on the 36 civilian deaths in one week (June 7-13) and 49 in another (June 14-20), we can estimate approximately 150-200 civilian deaths for the full month of June if these trends continued.
– **Combatant Deaths**: The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed over just two days (June 27-28) suggest very high combatant casualties. Even if this is an overestimation or an outlier event, and the actual average is significantly lower, we’re still looking at potentially 800-1,500 combatant deaths across both sides for the month.
– **Trend Indicators**: Multiple sources point to intensification of conflict in June 2025, with increases in airstrikes, artillery engagements, and front-line clashes. This suggests that June’s casualty figures are likely to be on the higher end of recent monthly totals.
### Key Assumptions and Uncertainty Analysis
1. **Assumption: Recent Data is Representative** (70% confidence)
– The partial weekly data provided for June is representative of the entire month.
– If incorrect (30% chance), casualty figures could be higher or lower. If fighting significantly intensified in late June (as some sources suggest), the total could be higher than my estimate.
2. **Assumption: Combatant Death Reporting is Accurate** (60% confidence)
– The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in late June are broadly accurate.
– If incorrect (40% chance), this could significantly impact the total. Military casualties are often exaggerated in wartime reporting. However, even adjusted downward, the intensive combat described would still yield substantial casualties.
3. **Assumption: ACLED’s Methodology Remains Consistent** (85% confidence)
– ACLED’s approach to tallying and reporting state-based conflict deaths has remained consistent.
– If incorrect (15% chance), changes in methodology could affect how deaths are counted, potentially shifting the total between categories.
### Synthesis and Final Estimate
Combining the civilian death estimates (150-200) with combatant death estimates (800-1,500), the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025 would likely fall in the range of 950-1,700. The midpoint of this range is approximately 1,325, which falls in the “Between 1000 and 1500” category.
Given the intensity of fighting described, particularly in late June, the evidence suggests that the total is unlikely to be below 500. Similarly, while there’s some possibility the total could exceed 2,000 if the most extreme reports are accurate, the preponderance of evidence points toward the middle ranges.
The partial data and historical trends make the “Between 1000 and 1500” range most probable, with “Between 1500 and 2000” as the next most likely outcome given the reports of intensified fighting. There’s a moderate possibility for “Between 500 and 1000” if combatant casualties were significantly overreported or if there was a notable de-escalation in parts of June. The extreme categories (“Less than 500” and “Greater than 2000”) appear least likely based on the available evidence.
Taking all factors into account, including the uncertainty in the data and the possibility of reporting biases, my final probability distribution is:
Option_A: 5
Option_B: 25
Option_C: 40
Option_D: 20
Option_E: 10
=== Forecast Result ===
{
“probability_yes”: null,
“probability_yes_per_category”: {
“Less than 500”: 0.05000000000000001,
“Between 500 and 1000”: 0.25000000000000006,
“Between 1000 and 1500”: 0.4000000000000001,
“Between 1500 and 2000”: 0.20000000000000004,
“Greater than 2000”: 0.0999999999999998
},
“continuous_cdf”: null
}
=== Reasoning ===
All Predictions:
[{‘Less than 500’: 0.1, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.3, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.15, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05000000000000001, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.25000000000000006, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.4000000000000001, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.20000000000000004, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.0999999999999998}, {‘Less than 500’: 0.05, ‘Between 500 and 1000’: 0.2, ‘Between 1000 and 1500’: 0.45, ‘Between 1500 and 2000’: 0.25, ‘Greater than 2000’: 0.05}]
Median Reasoning:
EXTRACTED_PROBABILITIES: [5, 25, 40, 20, 10]
Model’s Answer:
## Analysis of State-based Conflict Deaths in Ukraine for June 2025
To forecast the number of state-based conflict deaths reported by ACLED in Ukraine for June 2025, I need to carefully analyze the available data while acknowledging significant uncertainties in the information provided.
### Key Data Points and Trends
The research assistants have provided several relevant data points that help establish context:
1. **Partial June 2025 Data**: ACLED’s situational update for June 7-13, 2025 reported at least 36 civilian deaths from Russian attacks, but did not specify combatant casualties. Another source indicated 49 civilian deaths for the June 14-20 period, showing a 29% increase from the previous week.
2. **Intensity of Combat**: Multiple sources indicate high-intensity fighting during June 2025, with reports of approximately 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in 153 clashes (June 27-28), 537 Russian airstrikes (many intercepted), and 203 daily combat engagements in mid-June.
3. **Historical Context**: ACLED documented 24 Russian long-range strikes resulting in 34 civilian deaths in late May 2025. Previous data from January 2025 showed 1,391 political violence events with 24 civilian deaths in a single week.
4. **Broader Conflict Metrics**: UN reports indicate a 37% increase in civilian casualties from December 2024 to May 2025, with approximately 200 monthly civilian fatalities in the first half of 2025.
### Synthesizing the Evidence
Looking at this information holistically, I need to extrapolate the partial data to estimate the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025:
– **Civilian Deaths**: Based on the 36 civilian deaths in one week (June 7-13) and 49 in another (June 14-20), we can estimate approximately 150-200 civilian deaths for the full month of June if these trends continued.
– **Combatant Deaths**: The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed over just two days (June 27-28) suggest very high combatant casualties. Even if this is an overestimation or an outlier event, and the actual average is significantly lower, we’re still looking at potentially 800-1,500 combatant deaths across both sides for the month.
– **Trend Indicators**: Multiple sources point to intensification of conflict in June 2025, with increases in airstrikes, artillery engagements, and front-line clashes. This suggests that June’s casualty figures are likely to be on the higher end of recent monthly totals.
### Key Assumptions and Uncertainty Analysis
1. **Assumption: Recent Data is Representative** (70% confidence)
– The partial weekly data provided for June is representative of the entire month.
– If incorrect (30% chance), casualty figures could be higher or lower. If fighting significantly intensified in late June (as some sources suggest), the total could be higher than my estimate.
2. **Assumption: Combatant Death Reporting is Accurate** (60% confidence)
– The reports of 1,000+ Russian soldiers killed in late June are broadly accurate.
– If incorrect (40% chance), this could significantly impact the total. Military casualties are often exaggerated in wartime reporting. However, even adjusted downward, the intensive combat described would still yield substantial casualties.
3. **Assumption: ACLED’s Methodology Remains Consistent** (85% confidence)
– ACLED’s approach to tallying and reporting state-based conflict deaths has remained consistent.
– If incorrect (15% chance), changes in methodology could affect how deaths are counted, potentially shifting the total between categories.
### Synthesis and Final Estimate
Combining the civilian death estimates (150-200) with combatant death estimates (800-1,500), the total state-based conflict deaths for June 2025 would likely fall in the range of 950-1,700. The midpoint of this range is approximately 1,325, which falls in the “Between 1000 and 1500” category.
Given the intensity of fighting described, particularly in late June, the evidence suggests that the total is unlikely to be below 500. Similarly, while there’s some possibility the total could exceed 2,000 if the most extreme reports are accurate, the preponderance of evidence points toward the middle ranges.
The partial data and historical trends make the “Between 1000 and 1500” range most probable, with “Between 1500 and 2000” as the next most likely outcome given the reports of intensified fighting. There’s a moderate possibility for “Between 500 and 1000” if combatant casualties were significantly overreported or if there was a notable de-escalation in parts of June. The extreme categories (“Less than 500” and “Greater than 2000”) appear least likely based on the available evidence.
Taking all factors into account, including the uncertainty in the data and the possibility of reporting biases, my final probability distribution is:
Option_A: 5
Option_B: 25
Option_C: 40
Option_D: 20
Option_E: 10